[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] CW weighting

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] CW weighting
From: "Lyle Dunlap" <qskqrq@grics.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 20:01:13 -0500
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Good point Marinus, I had occasion one time to need Keying Compensation on a 
new digital rig.   Not to be confused with Keying Delay or Weighting,   I 
ended up with the MFJ 495 which is a great keyer.   Many listen to side tone 
and have no idea what they sound like on air.

Lyle W9FCX

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Marinus Loewensteijn" <zl2ml@hotmail.com>
To: "Tentec list" <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2008 5:17 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] CW weighting

> What a lot of folks do not realise is that with modern DSP processing the 
> CW get's "muddled" and characters get shortened. This is especially 
> noticeable if you are using an external DSP processor, the only one that 
> has coming to my attention which is capale of keeping up with QSK at 
> reasonable speed is the  MFJ 784.
> The proper way to fix this is to improve the DSP part and not start 
> increasing the length of the characters. The increased length of the 
> characters sound horrible when you are listening on something like the 
> Omni 546C.
> 73, Marinus, ZL2ML
> _________________________________________________________________
> Find singles in your area with Match.
> http://a.ninemsn.com.au/b.aspx?URL=http%3A%2F%2Fmatch%2Enz%2Emsn%2Ecom%2Fchannel%2Findex%2Easpx%3Ftrackingid%3D1043416&_r=WL_EMAL_TAG&_m=EXT
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

TenTec mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>