To: |
"Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com> |
---|---|

Subject: |
[TenTec] OT Antenna Tuners |

From: |
"Alfred Lorona" <w6wqc@dslextreme.com> |

Reply-to: |
Alfred Lorona <w6wqc@dslextreme.com>, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |

Date: |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 19:17:16 -0700 |

List-post: |
<tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |

Any complex source impedance can be matched to any complex load impedance by two L network configurations. One will be a low pass (series L and shunt C) while the other will be a high pass configuration (series C and shunt L) when connected from source to load. Some source/load values will result in 4 possible configurations. It depends on the following two relationships between source and load impedances. The real part of the load, when the load is in the equivalent series form, must be less than 50 ohms, which is the usual source impedance. Simultaneously, with the load expressed in the equivalent parallel form, the real part must be larger than 50 ohms. An easiest way to find all of this out is to download the free L matching software 'LC Match' from RadioCom Corp which is easily found in the Google search thingie. For examples of all of the above, when matching a load of, say, 500 +j200 ohms to 50 ohms at 14 mHZ, the two possible networks are: 1. series 185 nh, shunt 7 pf and which is a low pass network. 2. series 7 pf, shunt 231 nh and which is a high pass network. If the load impedance when in series equivalent form is, say, 15 +j30, notice that the 15 ohms real part is lower than the 50 ohm source. And notice that it is larger than 50, it is 75, when the load is in the parallel equivalent form. Therefore we would expect to see four possible configurations. And, sure enough, these are: 1. series 402 nh, shunt 410 pf. 2. series 322 pf, shunt 196 pf. 3. shunt 347 pf, series 1604 pf. 4. shunt 372 nh, series 215 pf. In the first example, the coil of 185 nh would probably be preferable to the larger coil of 231 nh for lowest tuner loss. Actually there's not much difference in this case. In the second example, things are pretty much even. Note however, that two of the possibilities require only two capacitors and no coils in the tuner. Unfortunately, the capacitor values appear prohibitively high and therefore difficult to come by. It's a toss up between solutions 1 and 4. I am not certain but I believe that all popular antenna analyzer instruments yield measurements in the series form but don't take my word for it. At any rate the LC Match program requires load input in the series form. As simple as an L C network appears, there are a few additional interesting subtleties but I didn't want to complicate the issue too much. If the load impedance is given as a parallel equivalent form, always transform to the series form to check for the possibility of four networks. Actually, the best thing to do is use EZNEC as the antenna modeling software, ARRL's TLW Transmission line software and RadioCom's LC match software. These will give you a comprehensive picture of your antenna system. Too bad there isn't ONE program that combines all three elements and none that I know about that calculates tuner losses; L, PI, T and others. What about that, you software writers out there? 73, AL _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |

Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Another Delta II Question, Steve Berg |
---|---|

Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] OT Antenna Tuners, Ken Brown |

Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] OT Antenna Tuners, Marinus Loewensteijn |

Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] OT Antenna Tuners, Ken Brown |

Indexes: | [Date]
[Thread]
[Top]
[All Lists] |