TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] OT Florescent Ballast's

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] OT Florescent Ballast's
From: "CSM\(r\) Gary Huber" <glhuber@msn.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 21:07:00 -0600
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Jim,

I've been retired for six years and do not have the NEC and FCC manual sets nor 
the ballast information available... It seems like this class of device was 
industrial / commercial use only and was not considered part 15. As previously 
stated the electronic ballasts were generating a lot of VHF -  UHF energy which 
was strong enough to QRM standard one way pagers that were carried into the 
building. We ran a spectrum analyzer and the ballasts were within manufacture's 
specifications and in compliance with FCC regs but we could not use the slide 
projectors when the ballasts were energized. We got what was specified by our 
building design department (no coordination with my unit which was the 
company's "wireless communications team" http://www.csm-gh.com/ECS-2000.htm ) 
and the manufacture was not liable but replaced the A/V equipment anyway. 

Best regards,

CSM(r) Gary Huber - AB9M
9679 Heron Bay Rd
Bloomington, IL 61705
(309-662-0604)
www.csm-gh.com 
glhuber@msn.com 
gary.huber@us.army.mil 

--------------------------------------------------
From: "Jim Brown K9YC" <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2008 7:37 PM
To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Cc: "RFI List" <rfi@contesting.com>; <w1rfi@arrl.net>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] OT Florescent Ballast's

> On Mon, 8 Dec 2008 16:45:32 -0600, CSM\(r\) Gary Huber wrote:
> 
>>I was called in to figure out the problem and determined the 
> lighting circuits (and the ballasts) were radiating between 150 MHz 
>>and 500 MHz but were within the FCC limits for that class device. 
>>The ballast manufacturer and supplier provided the replacement 
>>projectors and remotes rather than fix the problem. 
> 
> Can you tell me the "class of device" and exactly what Part of the 
> FCC Rules the mfr told you covers it?  The so-called "electronic 
> transformers" (actually switching power supplies) that run 
> architectural low voltage (12V) lighting have taken over the track 
> lighting world. I inherited several in the home I bought when I 
> moved to CA three years ago, and they are VERY noisy. Go to an 
> electrical supply store to buy a transformer, and that's all they 
> have. Not only that, but the lighting fixtures are built in such a 
> way that a REAL transformer won't fit, and won't fit in an 
> electrical backbox that fits in the ceiling or wall. 
> 
> This is a VERY big issue looming on the horizon (bigger than BPL by 
> a lot), and the ARRL seems to be asleep at the switch. When a 
> neighbor installs one of these devices, your enjoyment of ham radio 
> is going go downhill fast. 
> 
> 73,
> 
> Jim Brown K9YC 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>