Re: [TenTec] 564 9 mHz Filters

["Bob Good" <k4bg@planters.net>]

Thanks Jack for the reply.  I agree with you based on my present 17 year old 
Omni.  Others have responded the INRAD while better, are for the select few 
and expensive.  (((73)))  Bob
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jack B. Friend" <jfriend31@comcast.net>
To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Sunday, May 03, 2009 9:24 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] 564 9 mHz Filters


> i have all my filter slots full with TT 250Hz and 500Hz filters. i have
> not tried Inrad filters so can't compare. i like the TT filters as they
> are relatively quiet and have no ring. also found them thru this
> reflector at considerably less than retail.
>
> jack
>
>
> On Sun, 2009-05-03 at 20:16 -0400, Bob Good wrote:
> > I just purchased an Omni VI Plus (564) and I am looking to fill my "N-2"
> > filter slot.  I have a 1.8 mHz TT filter in N-1 and the full complement 
> > in
> > the 6.3 slots.  I am 90% cw and have operated a Omni VI (563) for 17 
> > years.
> > I want a 500 Hz filter in this slot.  In your opinion should I purchase 
> > the
> > TT 217 or an "Inrad"  filter?  Roofing filter is a term I have yet to 
> > learn.
> > Your thoughts would be appreciated.  Any help for the OM?  Thanks  Bob 
> > K4BG
> > k4bg@planters.net
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > TenTec mailing list
> > TenTec@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec