| To: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Palstar tuner |
| From: | Stuart Rohre <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu> |
| Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Thu, 21 May 2009 20:37:52 -0500 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
Inherently in theory, the L match is less lossy, because you have one
less physical component. Since real components are not perfect, the
more you have, (like the 3 in the T circuit, vs. 2 in the L), the more
loss in the larger component count circuit. This neglects loss that may
come from undersized switch contacts, poor layout in the enclosure,
etc. One can only evaluate true losses by measuring power in and power
out of any tuner.
Stuart Rohre K5KVH |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Palstar tuner, Richards |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [TenTec] Wanted: Ten Tec Centaur Amplifier, jeff . l |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Palstar tuner, Dr. Gerald N. Johnson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Palstar tuner, Dr. Gerald N. Johnson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |