Well thank goodness it's NOT ur world. Nothing wrong with reasonable
adults engaged in a healty opinion based debate.
Sent from my iPhone 3gs
On Nov 11, 2009, at 7:44 PM, "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>
wrote:
> Personally I'm offended by the tone and the language of this entire
> thread.
>
> I think it should be stopped.
>
> 73 de Gary, AA2IZ
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <tlp1@vzavenue.net>
> To: <tentec@contesting.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 9:25 PM
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] TenTec Digest, Vol 83, Issue 11
>
>
>> HAR, HAR!!!
>>
>> Yeah certainly so if you are an "appliance operator". Is that
>> what you are? Don't "real hams" know radio electronics, at
>> least enough to repair and modify their own equipment. By your
>> reply I bet you don't. If you did, you wouldn't be offended.
>>
>> But then again, who knows. You brag about restoring vintage
>> junk. Wouldn't the Orion II have better performance than some
>> (most) of those antiques.
>>
>> Some of YOU "hams" are a witless lot.....
>>
>> KU5Q
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: john [mailto:johnmb@nc.rr.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 4:26 PM
>> To: tlp1@vzavenue.net
>> Subject: Orion II
>>
>> That is simply the most ridiculous argument in this entire thread.
>>
>> Apparently NOBODY can criticize Tentec, unless you can build
>> your own station.
>>
>> That's like saying you can't claim Toyota made a lemon unless
>> you can build your own car. There's no linkage between the
>> two in the real world.
>>
>> John K5MO
>>
>> Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 19:09:33 -0500
>> From: john <johnmb@nc.rr.com>
>> Subject: [TenTec] OII
>> To: tentec@contesting.com
>>
>> I think it's a shame that a well thought out posting about the
>> lack of
>> ongoing support for the OII is labelled as "whining". Calling
>> it that is
>> as childish as it is inaccurate.
>>
>> Though the OII is a fine rig (as all posters have said) times
>> change, usage
>> changes, technology changes and for a company to stay in the
>> marketplace,
>> they're obliged to change too. TT has made promises of
>> support that they
>> can't or won't keep and it is costing them in market share
>> and repeat
>> customers.
>>
>> I own numerous pieces of both TT and Elecraft gear and
>> they're both fine
>> companies. There is however a dramatically different
>> relationship between
>> user and designers with Elecraft. There's excitement in owning
>> a radio that
>> truly *is* updated to keep pace with developments as TT
>> claimed to do with
>> the Orions but in fact has not. They have a responsive
>> organization that
>> reads and replies to inquiries and suggestions and in general
>> continues to
>> advance the capability of their product line through this ongoing
>> interaction with their customers.
>>
>> I really wish TenTec the best, but they're not helping their
>> cause by
>> making promises they don't keep and refusing to communicate
>> regularly with
>> their customers.
>>
>> 73
>> John K5MO
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|