TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] [Tentec] Ten Tec Omni VII

To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] [Tentec] Ten Tec Omni VII
From: "H. M. Motley, Jr," <hmmjr@comcast.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 14:15:08 +0000 (UTC)
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
He called me Puck cuz that's my name! :-)
73,
H. M. "Puck" Motley W4PM

To:  <atrampler@att.net>, "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" 
<tentec@contesting.com> 
Subject:  Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec Omni VII 
From:  "John Molenda" <brazos@rochester.rr.com> 
Reply-to:  Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> 
Date:  Mon, 1 Feb 2010 20:19:10 -0500 
List-post:  <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com> 

Why did you have to call the guy a Puck ?
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Art Trampler" <atrampler@att.net>
To: "'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'" <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 7:03 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec Omni VII


> Excellent observations Puck.  I run an Option III with the lower center
> frequency CW roofing filter, and the 221 lower CF 250hz N2 filter and love
> it...but the NR on it is just not what it can be on a newer rig.
>
> Would love to try one side by side with this, but don't think I'd be able 
> to
> send it back.
>
> 73,
> Art, K0R0

 
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: [TenTec] [Tentec] Ten Tec Omni VII, H. M. Motley, Jr, <=