TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] swr

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] swr
From: John Molenda <cdistflatfoot@gmail.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2010 22:01:17 -0400
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
  Would you be so kind as to post the question to Don .  I have 
difficulty getting on Yahoo groops.  thanks John kb2huk

On 8/15/2010 9:54 PM, Richards wrote:
> I also have a 43 foot monopole antenna  (with 63 radials - but I agree
> 45 radials at 45 feet each is a good base.)
>
> I would suspect the balun / un-un you might be using.   I know both
> ArraySolutions - Zero-5 modified the balun - un-un they supply with
> their big stick, and DX-Engineering also changed from a current balun
> (which was OK) to an un-un design (which is claimed to be better).
>
> I can tune 160, but it is all the tuner can do to do that.
>
> DX-Engineering says (although I have some doubts, as does my aerospace
> EE Elmer....) that you can get a better match on 160 if you have
> something like 150-190 feet of coax (depending on the coax type and
> velocity factor, etc) as this makes some sort of tuning stub.   My elmer
> thinks not... but I know Collins used to ship an amp with an extended
> coax patch cable to insert into the line for just such an occasion.
>
> I know DX-Engineering does not add a ground to its antenna - other than
> grounding the coax on its way into the shack  (as is de riggeure for
> antenna installations.)   Perhaps you could try it without the ground at
> the antenna end and see if it matters - on a nice sunny day, of course !
>
> My research and experience with my big stick tells me it is VERY
> difficult to tune these antennas on 160 - and I consider every contact
> on that band just plain gravy - a bonus, as it were.
>
> Bill Salas has written several articles for QST and publishes them on a
> web site dealing with the difficulties tuning these big sticks on 160
> and 80 meters - to the end that he has developed a relatively simple and
> straightforward heavy duty matching network to add (switchable remotely
> by relays...) when working the top two bands.   I am seriously
> considering adding these into the mix.   I forget his call, but look for
> him on the internet, as he is well read and well regarded on the topic.
>    I think he has authored two or three articles on the topic in QST this
> year, alone.
>
> ALSO... adding a capacity hat (like 45 feet of wire)  to top-load the
> big stick seems like a very worthy thing to try.  My research tells me
> that can substantially help in matching the stick to the rig.
>
> I would ask Palstar bout it... and also the AT-AUTO discussion group on
> Yahoo-groups as Don, the engineer who designed it and who wrote the
> software code for it, posts there daily.   If you cannot or don't joint
> for some reason, I can post the question for you.
>
> Happy trails.
>
> ============================= K8JHR  ============================
>
>
> \
> On 8/15/2010 8:03 PM, John Molenda wrote:
>>     Hi All , I have a TT Orion II and when I use it on 160 with a palstar
>> auto tuner , TT Titan III 417Amp  and a new zero five vertical antenna
>> The swr runs a muck.  This only happens with 250 watts or more , the swr
>> will read on the radio or  tuner say 3.1:1  the Palstar auto tuner
>> knocks it down to 1:1 and all is fine then all of a sudden maybe in the
>> middle of a qso the swr will rise to 3 .1:1and I have to re tune and of
>> course this will send the amp into a fault position . It is almost like
>> the tuner just stops working .  I can't remember if this has happened on
>> other bands but it will happen on 160 .  to answer some questions , no
>> the tuner in the OII is not on when I use the palstar tuner .  And Yes I
>> have 48 radials down at 45 foot each.  I use no grounding inside the
>> shack but my antennas and coax are grounded outside the shack .  Is the
>> problem the radio , tuner , amp or what .And by the way the antenna
>> plays real nice on all other bands .   thanks for your input in advance
>> .  all the best ! John kb2huk
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>