TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] (no subject)

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] (no subject)
From: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2010 19:24:50 -0400
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Why would that be?

        (I am NOT starting an argument... sincerely
        looking for reasons why another rig, with other
        features or settings, would work better - I am just
        getting into CW and some contesting with local \
        guys who are STEEPED in it and I cannot be too
        well informed.   Also I understand not all radios
        are designed to be contest rigs, which is OK, too.)


===================== James -K8JHR  ======================



On 11/1/2010 5:48 PM, Bill Rowlett wrote:
>
> If you do any contest work, forget the 590. Those with it say it suck this 
> weekend in the CQWWSSB contest.
>

==========================================================
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>