[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Rhombics

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Rhombics
From: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2010 18:41:01 -0500
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Yes, true.   One consideration is the fact it is a fairly in efficient 
receiving antenna as well.

I guess it's just so quiet, signal-to-noise-wise that it makes a good 
receiving antenna, but that same inefficiency holds it back on 
transmitting efficiency.

One of the happier paradoxes of life!Happy Trails.

====================  James  /  K8JHR ===================

On 12/5/2010 6:09 PM, JOSEPH DAVIS wrote:
> OK on Beverage Eff.  Most use Beverage to receive and vertical or
> dipole to transmit. I am still thinking why the Beverage is so
> ineffecient for transmitt.  jjdavis
TenTec mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>