[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Rhombics

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Rhombics
From: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 01:05:28 -0500
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Gee, and I thought I mentioned signal-to-noise ...  when I said :

        > I guess it's just so quiet, signal-to-noise-wise
        that it makes a good receiving antenna, but that
        same inefficiency holds it back on  transmitting
        efficiency. > One of the happier paradoxes of life

Happy Days !

=================== James -K8JHR  ========================

On 12/5/2010 7:31 PM, Rick - NJ0IP / DJ0IP wrote:
> I disagree.
> It depends on how on how you define "efficient".
> What matters is signal to noise difference.

TenTec mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>