[Top] [All Lists]

[TenTec] receiver specifications ---Eagle

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: [TenTec] receiver specifications ---Eagle
From: mike bryce <prosolar@sssnet.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 14:31:19 -0500
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
It's cold outside, so let me grab the pull tab of a brand-new can of worms and 
yank it open.

I know I'm not the sharpest knife int he drawer, and as the worms crawl out, 
I've been thinking of the Eagle. 

So, I was looking over the receiver specifications on the Sherwood Engineering 
web site :


the table is sorted by dynamic range narrow spaced.

So it seems that the Yaesu FTdx5000 is the leader


number seven down the list is the Ten Tec Eagle, coming in just under the Orion 

So, is the Eagle that much better than the ICOM pro series? (The Atlas 210 has 
a better receiver than the Icom 756 Pro III? The Heathkit SB104 better than the 
unmodified Drake R4C?)

Or, am I looking at the chart and seeing something else?

Can a casual operator like myself, tell the difference between the number seven 
Eagle and the K3, Orion II, and the Yaesu FTdx5000?



Mike, WB8VGE
SunLight Energy Systems
The Heathkit Shop
J e e p
"If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts."
 Albert Einstein

TenTec mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>