[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] New and Improved Terminology (NVIS origins)

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] New and Improved Terminology (NVIS origins)
From: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Reply-to: ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2011 19:09:25 -1000
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Hi Rick,

I'll have to review this, maybe I am suffering from a false memory, or 
an accurate memory of false information. I thought that a poor 
counterpoise under a vertical reduced the overall efficiency AND had a 
negative effect on the pattern diminishing the low angle radiation more 
than the higher angle radiation. N6LF's studies may help clear it up.
> The number of radials won't really affect the angle of radiation.
> With a poor ground, you will still have a low take-off angle; you'll just
> had a heck of a lot of ground losses.
TenTec mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>