[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] NEC, ground, grounds, radials (and keying)

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] NEC, ground, grounds, radials (and keying)
From: "Mike Hyder -N4NT-" <Mike_N4NT@charter.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 16:54:40 -0500
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
I submitted a paper comparing the number of discrete motions needed to send 
code using an iambic key versus a single-lever paddle.  The single-lever is 
more efficient.  The ARRL said it was not interested in articles like that. 
I always call them "The A - R - double-L."

73, Mike N4NT

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Steve Hunt" <steve@karinya.net>
To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Friday, January 07, 2011 4:20 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] NEC, ground, grounds, and radials.

> Jerry,
> That's interesting!
> I wrote them last year about exactly the same error in a QST article. I
> got a nice response acknowledging the error, but there was no correction
> ever printed.
> Similar response on half a dozen other issues, either within QST
> articles or the Antenna Book; I've now given up trying :)
> 73,
> Steve G3TXQ
> On 06/01/2011 22:46, Dr. Gerald N. Johnson wrote:
>> HQ can be most stubborn about correcting
>> technical errors too, try to get them to change. I have been trying to
>> get them to show the correct formula for low impedance parallel lines
>> for about 43 years. Hasn't had an effect yet.

TenTec mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>