TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] ADMIN: Message "The message's content type was not explicit

To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] ADMIN: Message "The message's content type was not explicitly allowed"
From: Jim Lowman <jmlowman@sbcglobal.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2011 10:22:00 -0800
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
I agree, Ed. You'd be surprised at how many guys get upset when I ask for their callsign. Isn't that the very first part of the exchange in most QSOs?

There should be a place on the membership application for callsign. Some of you are all too happy to point this out when I reject your application. In thought I had added it at one point, but maybe a Mailman software update wiped it out.

All in all, my compliments to the 1,300+ members of this list for their excellent demeanor.

73 de Jim - AD6CW

On 12/3/2011 6:35 PM, Ed wrote:
Trying to approve new members that do not have their call in their email address or request to join is another major PITA. Whats the matter, you guys ashamed of your call or name ??? OK, my nickles worth, just remember, before you go complaining to or about how Jim runs the list, I'm sure he would be more than glad to let you try your hand at it. Ed W3NR (and yes...I'm very proud of my name and call)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>