On 2/18/2012 2:14 PM, Hulett, Russell wrote:
> I've avoided owning a scope, but the recent discussion about troubleshooting
> low power from an Omni D has me rethinking. Most of the gear I own now old,
> have managed to diagnose problems without owning a scope. In one case, the
> problem with an old hollow-state receiver was found by poking around with a
> wooden dowel to expose a poor solder joint. My main concern is spending more
> money on a scope than my shack is worth, or alternately spending more time
> fixing a used scope than is warranted.
> Would be curious about thoghts from others who repair their own gear about
> what minimum-required scope would be.
Whether you would use it or not or feel uncomfortable using a scope, I
cannot answer...but if you do decide you want one, let me suggest a
Tektronix dual-trace 100 Mhz scope. At the e-place, they regularly go
TenTec mailing list