TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] 566 v3.028

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] 566 v3.028
From: "Rodney" <w3krq@dejazzd.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2012 14:30:42 -0400
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
  Try a 709a mike. you will be surprise.     Rod

-----Original Message----- 
From: Richards
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2012 2:22 PM
To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
Subject: Re: [TenTec] 566 v3.028

I would not be surprised if the 707 would benefit from a very light
preamp.   It would not take much to boost it going in, and then pare
back HW Gain and mic input levels on the rig to where they should be.
It is not a fault of either mic or rig, really.   This happens all over
in the sound recording arena, also in any live music scenario.

I an provide some simple schematics for this, or suggest some small,
inexpensive pre-amps if you like.   While it may gall you to spend
another, oh... $45-90 on a nice little preamp, it can be the right tool
for the job in many cases.   I often use a dynamic mic with low inherent
open signal voltage with an inexpensive preamp, and then use the Line-In
input on the rig - I feel it is cleaner.   The rig has a preamp built of
sorts built into the mic input circuit, and a high quality external
preamp on the Line-In input is often a cleaner, more robust signal in
the end.

Parenthetically, I use the M-Audio AudioBuddy preamp in my shack for two
purposes:   one mic routes a mic to the transceiver, while another line
routes another mic to my computer for speech recognition software.  It
cost me $70 (typical street price, sometimes higher or lower
depending...)  and I have used this for near 10 years in this and other
capacities, usually with home recording  (I play guitar.)

I like it plenty, but there are less expensive products that do the same
job very well for less cost.  Some guys use a small recording mixer
which contains just such a preamp, and they use it for more functions
than to mic a transceiver.   I have used a similar arrangement to route
both microphone input at line level AND play computer sound files at
line level, as an ersatz voice-keyer, so I can use the computer to call
CQ during a contest, even when I am not doing that through a logging or
control program such as N1MM which has facilities for this.   That way,
I can log on one computer, using one program, and play voice keyer with
another, and so forth.

Just MY take. . . .

=========================== James - K8JHR  ===================



On 4/5/2012 9:14 AM, Rsoifer@aol.com wrote:
> Thanks for the info guys, but RF feedback is only part of the problem.
> There is still audio distortion caused  by having to run the mic input and 
> H/W
> mic gain at too high a level (with the 707 mic).  I didn't have that 
> problem
> with v2.041XT, nor do I have it with v3.028 and the 706 mic.  I'd still
> like to be able to use the 707, though.
>
> 73 Ray W2RS
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec 


_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>