TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] 566 v3.028 spot versus SAF

To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] 566 v3.028 spot versus SAF
From: Rsoifer@aol.com
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2012 08:55:23 -0400 (EDT)
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
In a message dated 4/6/2012 10:22:05 AM GMT Standard Time, 
barry.n1eu@gmail.com writes:


> 
> 
> 
> 
> I don't have the issues you're describing on my 565 SAF and it shouldn't
> have anything to do with your subreceiver type.
> 
> What would really help is a recording of your SAF in action.  A bit of
> spectral analysis of such a recording might reveal a lot.
> 
> If you can make such a recording (WAV or mp3), just tune to a carrier,
> matching your sidetone frequency, and engage SAF at a narrow setting
> 

As best I can tell by ear, the difference between my (566 v3.028) spot and 
SAF is 2 Hz.  That is with SPOT at 350 Hz, STEP at 1 Hz and SAF W at 10 Hz.

73 Ray W2RS
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: [TenTec] 566 v3.028 spot versus SAF, Rsoifer <=