TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] OCF antennas evolution

To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] OCF antennas evolution
From: Carter <k8vt@ameritech.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 11:29:27 -0400
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
On 7/10/2013 11:33 PM, Michael Tortorella wrote:

> I feel compelled to weigh in here....back in the late '70s I used an
> OCFD design from Ham Radio magazine which was pretty straightforward.
> It was 135' long, fed with 44' of 300-ohm open wire to a 4:1 balun
> and then a run of RG-11 into the shack. It was superb. Never had any
> stray current problems. Worked about 150 countries using a Johnson
> Navigator, 40 watts input. Would like to reproduce that next time
> out. Don't pooh-pooh the OCFD design, be careful and it works well.
> 73 Mike W2IY

I smile when I see everybody describing their favorite wire antenna, so let me jump in with my comments (asbestos suit on). <grin>

Mike, not to deny your success nor picking on you or anyone else describing their favorite wire antenna...but with ANY antenna, the RF has to go somewhere.

I'm using a dipole about 130 feet long and maybe 25 feet off the ground fed entirely with ladder line (and a Johnson Matchbox) and worked a LOT of DX including Indonesia on 80, the VK0IR dxpedition and even North Korea on RTTY with that antenna.

Heck, Kurt N. Sterba wrote in 'World Radio' magazine that he used a SHOPPING CART as an antenna during a DX contest and worked 17 countries! Again, the RF has gotta go somewhere.

Bottom line: DX performance seems more attributable to the Propagation gods rather than what flavor of wire antenna is being used.

73,
Carter   K8VT

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>