TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [TenTec] Eagle problem?

from [Jim Brown] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: "k9yc@arrl.net" <k9yc@arrl.net>, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Eagle problem?
From: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Reply-to: k9yc@arrl.net, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 08:34:11 -0700
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> 
On 5/20/2014 8:28 AM, Cecil wrote:

Not if his focus is providing lightning protection...he is spot on.

Jim your concepts are fine in a studio somewhere but show up at a cell/tower 
site with them and they will run you off with a stick.
WRONG. The concept I have outlined is focused on BOTH lightning and audio, IN HAM SHACKS. And ham shacks are NOT cell/tower sites. They are ham shacks. And grounding and bonding practices for a studio are quite different from either of these methods. 

73, Jim K9YC
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [TenTec] Eagle problem?, Cecil
Next by Date:  Re: [TenTec] Eagle problem?, Cecil
Previous by Thread:  Re: [TenTec] Eagle problem?, Cecil
Next by Thread:  Re: [TenTec] Eagle problem?, Cecil
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]