TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] repairs

To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] repairs
From: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2014 13:44:21 -1000
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>

Are there any radios that are user serviceable other than the antiques? If I am in the middle of nowhere and my radio quits
then what?

A question I have been pondering lately too.

Many of the "can't live without" features that newer rigs have can only be had using large scale integration. Which generally means static sensitive devices, or devices too expensive to have a complete stock of, or too difficult to change out, if you could figure out which one needs changing. If it breaks it often makes more sense to just buy a new rig and not waste money/effort trying to fix the broken rig that is only a few years old. Of course that is not an option if you are in the middle of nowhere, and you want to get on the air before the next supply drop comes.

Yet many of those features we really CAN live without. I'm not arguing that you could be seriously competitive in a multiband contest without a bunch of neat features. For simply enjoying a QSO, or having basic communications in a disaster, I can't think of anything that cannot be accomplished with tubes or discrete semiconductors. Maybe a good idea to have at least one really basic, yet high quality rig on hand, even if you also have rigs with the "can't live without" features.

I don't suppose there is a big enough market to support Ten-Tec or anyone else coming out with this kind of basic rig (other than in QRP versions). Would be neat though.

DE N6KB

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>