TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] NB verses NR

To: n4py3@earthlink.net, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] NB verses NR
From: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2014 18:59:51 -0500
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>

On 12/14/2014 4:29 PM, Carl Moreschi wrote:
No. CW can be handled by selecting as small a bandwidth as possible. SSB on the other hand is much more difficult. That's where all the proprietary schemes come in.

----------------------------------------------------------

Are you limiting your reply to TT radios? I believe the TS-590 has two types of NR, and each is sorta targeted for different types of noise. I believe the general consensus is NR1 works best (and was intended for) SSB, while NR2 works best (and was intended for) CW. Kenwood product literature reinforces this impression, so I might conclude some manufacturers do target different, and specific NR settings for CW.

Also, my outboard DSP filters have settings specifically intended for CW.

This is a broad subject, N'est ce pas?

==================== K8JHR  =================


_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>