[TOEC] RE:

[Peter Forsberg]

�mne: SV: [TOEC] Yaesu TS2000


Tjena Janne! l�get?
Tycker att det var en glamor�s beskrivning,
men ur en fanatikers syn.
Det d�r med vad man har att k�r med �r nog ganska personligt och vad man har blivit van med tror jag.
Sj�lv s� har jag haft f�rm�nen att prova en del av det "nyare" gardet och det mesta har funkat.

Annars s� tror jag att pl�nboken styr nog en del ocks�.
Nog om detta fr�n mig.
Ha en fortsatt trevlig avslutning av sommaren janne och hoppas att hg finner tid att komma upp till dig.
Satt brevid n�r du fr�gade : "�r du en dyr j�vel" (p� boden m�l).
N� ha det janne och hoppas att vi kan synas i framtiden.
Mvh Peter/sm2odb


----- Ursprungligt meddelande ----- 
Fr�n: <Jan.E.Holm@telia.se>
Till: <toec@contesting.com>
Skickat: den 2 augusti 2001 20:03
�mne: [TOEC] Yaesu TS2000


> Trist att beh�va l�sa en mycket f�rdelaktig beskrivning
> av TS2000 i QTC n�r det tydligen f�rh�ller sig p� ett
> annat s�tt i verkliga livet. 
> Detta som en uppmaning att man inte skall tro blint p�
> dessa gl�ttiga beskrivningar som helt saknar fakta bakgrund.
> 
> 73, Janne SM2EKM
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> > 
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jon Ogden <na9d@speakeasy.net>
> > To: W8JI@contesting.com <W8JI@contesting.com>; Amps Reflector
> > <amps@contesting.com>
> > Date: 02 August 2001 13:15
> > Subject: Re: [AMPS] FT100D driving Alpha 87a
> > 
> > 
> > >
> > >on 8/1/01 4:25 AM, Tom Rauch at w8ji@akorn.net wrote:
> > >
> > >> There are actually several problems that cause problems. One is
> > >> many new radios have very poor transmitter IMD performance. Look
> > >> at the TS-2000 as an example. It is almost class C quality, yet
> > >> reviews all ignore that fact.
> > >
> > >I think the RSGB's publication pointed this out.  I was talking to 
> > G3RZP at
> > >Dayton and he told me he read it was a piece o crap transmitter.
> >  The RSGB review fell far short of criticism. The IMD levels were 
> >  measured
> > in the -20s and, as best I recall, the review commented something to 
> > the
> > effect of 'could be better'. Peter saw it as crap because he 
> > understands the
> > numbers - to those who don't the review would not have given the 
> > impression
> > that the performance was unacceptably poor. I'm saddened by that, as 
> > the
> > reviewer has always been held in high esteem, and often points out 
> > poor
> > performance, such as phase noise in modern receivers.
> > 
> > Steve
> > 
> > 
> > --
> > FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
> > Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
> > Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
> > Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
> > 
> 
> 
> --
> TOEC on the Web:          http://www.qsl.net/toec/
> Submissions:              toec@contesting.com
> Administrative requests:  toec-REQUEST@contesting.com
> Problems:                 owner-toec@contesting.com
> 
> 



--
TOEC on the Web:          http://www.qsl.net/toec/
Submissions:              toec@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  toec-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-toec@contesting.com