----------
> From: dennis g. peterson <dennisgp@muscanet.com>
> To: topband@contesting.com
> Subject: TopBand: Subands on 160
To: <topband@contesting.com>
> Date: Friday, May 23, 1997 6:21 AM
>
> I hate to take up bandwidth but this question has been bothering me
>
> for some time now. That is:
>
> Why is it that the EAST COAST operators and stations seem to be the
>
> only operators and area that does not want to support the much needed
>
> subdivision of 160 into cw only and ssb only areas?
Dennis,
I am in Prairieville, LA and am not a big contester. I think 160 meters is
an historical band, and people have a bit of nostalgia about it, I know I
do. Also, it appears that if the regulation craze continues, the only
thing we will have left not regulated is our bowel movements.
Mike Michon AB5XP
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/topband.html
Submissions: topband@contesting.com
Administrative requests: topband-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-topband@contesting.com
|