Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

TopBand: Re: Low angle versus high angle

To: <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: TopBand: Re: Low angle versus high angle
From: k6se@juno.com (Earl W Cunningham)
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 1998 00:58:13 EST
Steve, VK6VZ writes:

Unfortunately, vertical polarised antennas don't work too well in some
places - like in the Perth area of VK6, for example.  Mike VK6HD and I
both use dipoles - myself an inverted-U at 66 - 45' high, while Mike has
an inverted-V at 90'.  Both of us have tried a range of vertical antennas
on 160m - from inverted-Ls to top loaded verticals to shunt fed towers,
but horizontals work better.
==================
Steve, it might be interesting if you or Mike tried a vertical again for
comparisons, but this time with 4 elevated tuned radials.  Radials
sloping upward from the ground would be an easy way to do it.  Your
opinion of the results would lend some insight to the elevated/on-ground
radial controversy.

73, de Earl, K6SE


_____________________________________________________________________
You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/topband.html
Submissions:              topband@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  topband-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-topband@contesting.com

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>