To: | <topband@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Topband: Geomagnetic absorption of horizontally polarized antenna signals? |
From: | Brad Rehm" <brehm@texas.net (Brad Rehm) |
Date: | Mon, 29 Apr 2002 15:16:57 -0500 |
"I wonder if anyone can offer opinions on the advantages that vertically polarized antennas have over horizontals on 160M related to geomagnetic Earth absortion?" Tom, There's an excellent discussion of this question in the chapter on propagation (the first chapter) in the latest edition of ON4UN's book on low band DXing. It comes down to a matter of where you're located. Verticals, he says, are the best transmitting antennas for North American hams. If I recall correctly, the same is not true for Europeans. John gives a pretty credible rationale for all this. Brad, KV5V |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Topband: Geomagnetic absorption of horizontally polarized antenna signals?, Tom Cathey |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Topband: YA5T - AP2ARS, Mark Demeuleneere on4ww |
Previous by Thread: | Topband: Geomagnetic absorption of horizontally polarized antenna signals?, Tom Cathey |
Next by Thread: | Topband: Geomagnetic absorption of horizontally polarized antenna signals?, Greg - ZL3IX |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |