To: | <topband@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Topband: PC networking |
From: | G3XRJ@btinternet.com (John - G3XRJ -) |
Date: | Wed, 18 Sep 2002 13:09:03 +0100 |
I already suffer QRM on Topband from my own ISDN - hopefully to be cured by changing to screened cat 5 cable. I now need to network two home PC's. Any thoughts on whether wireless or cable networking is to be preferred from a QRM angle on the low bands ? Regards John G3XRJ --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). To: <topband@contesting.com> Version: 6.0.389 / Virus Database: 220 - Release Date: 16/09/2002 |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Topband: Temporary W0AH/B on 1802.2 now, W0AH@aol.com |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Topband: W0AH/B 1802.2 15 mw beacon copied at 700 miles!, W0AH@aol.com |
Previous by Thread: | Topband: Temporary W0AH/B on 1802.2 now, W0AH@aol.com |
Next by Thread: | Topband: W0AH/B 1802.2 15 mw beacon copied at 700 miles!, W0AH@aol.com |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |