To: | "Tree" <tree@kkn.net>, <topband@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Topband: Receivers |
From: | "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com> |
Reply-to: | Tom Rauch <w8ji@contesting.com> |
Date: | Fri, 12 Nov 2004 14:11:14 -0500 |
List-post: | <mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
> IMHO (getting really brave jumping in here - so emphasis on the H), > the "in band" IMD is a very important feature when using a receiver > that will be dealing with lots of noise (like Topband). Indeed it is. This is the difference between receivers I like to use for weak CW signals and those I refuse to use. I hope the ARRL will be testing and reporting that characteristic soon in reviews. _______________________________________________ Topband mailing list Topband@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: Receivers, Tom Rauch |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Topband: Receivers, Tree |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: Receivers, Tree |
Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: Receivers, Tree |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |