| To: | <topband@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Topband: "Nested" 160/80m Arrays? Real World Experiences? |
| From: | "Billy Cox" <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com> |
| Date: | Sun, 30 Jan 2005 16:00:22 -0600 |
| List-post: | <mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
ON4UN's book mentions "nested" arrays, as in a 80m 4x array located inside a 160m 4x array ... anyone on here done this? Interested in real world experiences as to *IF* this is a practical alternative, or if there are some rules of thumb as to how close to site adjacent band arrays for 160m and 80m? TU! 73 Billy AA4NU _______________________________________________ Topband mailing list Topband@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Topband: ZS4TX into Oregon, Tree |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Topband: Conditions for the CQWW 160 CW 1/2 wave versus 1/4 wave, Jose M. Valdes R. YV5LIX |
| Previous by Thread: | Topband: ZS4TX into Oregon, Tree |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: "Nested" 160/80m Arrays? Real World Experiences?, Jon Zaimes AA1K |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |