Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: Measuring field strength (for the purpose ofradialevaluatio

To: <Telegrapher9@aol.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: Measuring field strength (for the purpose ofradialevaluation)
From: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2006 20:20:24 -0800
List-post: <mailto:topband@contesting.com>
 -----Original Message-----
From: Telegrapher9@aol.com [mailto:Telegrapher9@aol.com]
Sent: Sunday, December 24, 2006 5:12 PM
To: richard@karlquist.com
Cc: zl3ix@inet.net.nz; topband@contesting.com; w8ji@contesting.com
Subject: Re: Topband: Measuring field strength (for the purpose of
radialevaluation)


Rick,

I tried out your 230' x 230' ground screen in simulation. I get around 77
ohms for the 90-degree vertical. Strangely I get 75 ohms for a 3-degree
vertical. I was thinking that perhaps 40 ohms could be attributed to the
ground plane. I can vary the size of the screen in 45 degree increments
without much of a change in the Rin. I'll have to work on this some more.

The ground screen is somewhat similar to PCB power planes and IC tester
heads (that I simulate and modify accordingly) in that they have standing
waves concentric with the excitation source.

dave

-------------------------------------------------------------------

Did you model it as a continuous surface or, as it really is, a wire grid?
At 7 MHz, a 3ft by 3 ft grid is too large to be considered the same
as a continuous surface.  PCB power planes are continuous surfaces.
I am very confident that if you build a 1/4 wl vertical at 1 GHz on an
18"x1'8" PC board plane it will measure 36 ohms.

Rick N6RK


_______________________________________________
Topband mailing list
Topband@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>