> I have never been able to find a null when the 2 signals
> (noise and main)
> are "equal". In fact it always seemed that the noise had
> to be at least 3 db
> less than the main signal using the receivers S meter. I
> know this fly's
> against the manual guidance and the nulling theory, but
> this is what I, and other
> have found here using either the MFJ unit or the ANC4.
Noise often has a high ratio of peak to average power, S
meters don't always follow noise levels well for sharp noise
spikes with wide spacing. This is especially true when DSP
systems with wide IF stage filtering are involved since they
overload (not enough bits or speed to maintain pulse shape).
There was a fellow on the RFI reflector who was puzzled why,
when he switched in an attenuator, his S meter didn't show
noise dropping at the same rate as desired signals. His
noise dropped faster than the signal. This meant he could
use an attenuator and improve S/N ratio. After some emails
between us he tried a receiver that used crystal IF filters
instead of a DSP for primary selectivity and everything
behaved normally.
A guesS meter is certainly not the final authority on signal
levels, especially when some of the signal content is a
rapidly rising and falling pulse mixed with steady
signals....and we are trying to null the signal that does
not move the meter well.
By the way, the preamp in the 1026 is a voltage follower. It
depends on the input impedance being higher than the output
impedance to have gain. It has current gain, not voltage
gain. If the input is not high impedance (case in point the
internal whip) compared to the stages following the preamp
(the preamp load) it has no gain. If you need to amplify
without a high Z source on the noise input my suggestion is
a good external preamp.
I match the background noise level on all my antennas here
before my switching system by using preamps and/or
attenuators. This way I don't get a false feeling of an
antenna being "louder and better" when checking on moderate
signals when it really isn't better for S/N ratio weak
signals.
73 Tom
_______________________________________________
Topband mailing list
Topband@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband
|