To: | "Don Field" <don.field@gmail.com>, <topband@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Topband: Receivers for 160 |
From: | "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com> |
Reply-to: | Tom Rauch <w8ji@contesting.com> |
Date: | Fri, 16 Feb 2007 19:25:24 -0500 |
List-post: | <mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
> general coverage capability. Where the K2 scores is that > it is designed > purely for the ham bands, which allows a greater degree of > optimisation. The K2 I saw was so good because it used a reasonable noise figure CATV transistor RF amp, a medium quality Minicircuits double balanced diode mixer, and a CATV transistor bipolar amp following the mixer. Then a filter. 73 Tom _______________________________________________ Topband mailing list Topband@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] Loading a Pro-AM 160M on other bands?, kd4e |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Topband: Sherwood data...Recovery time???, wb6tza |
Previous by Thread: | Topband: Receivers for 160, Don Field |
Next by Thread: | Topband: W7iuv preamp, ron21246 |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |