To: | "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>,"Top Band Reflector" <topband@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Topband: Why not add power class to SP TBDC exchange? |
From: | "Guy Olinger, K2AV" <olinger@bellsouth.net> |
Date: | Tue, 1 Jan 2008 15:31:42 -0500 |
List-post: | <mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
"I love the SP just the way it is, but I think this would be an interesting addition." My sentiment also. Wouldn't change the exchange that much. Since the grid square ends in two numbers just affix a letter to the grid square: For me, FM02 becomes FM02Q for QRP, FM02A for Low, FM02B for QRO, using the familiar class identifiers from the SS. Pretty much the same, but a QRP or low power station trying to run might get a bit more attention. 73, Guy. _______________________________________________ Topband mailing list Topband@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: Daylight QSO's during the SP, Tom Rauch |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Topband: Why not add power class to SP TBDC exchange?, Tod -MN |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: Why not add power class to SP TBDC exchange?, Eric Hilding |
Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: Why not add power class to SP TBDC exchange?, Tod -MN |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |