To: | "TopBand List" <topband@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Topband: Polarisation coupling effects at MF?? |
From: | "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com> |
Date: | Sat, 13 Dec 2008 12:38:22 -0800 |
List-post: | <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
On Sat, 13 Dec 2008 14:34:07 -0500, Bill Tippett wrote: >Theoretically a dipole up 1/2 wavelength should >be 6-8 dB stronger than a vertical, but many have found just >the opposite is true (vertical 6-10 dB stronger). I'm convinced that the reason verticals play so much better on 160 than their vertical and horizontal patterns suggests is related to the way vertically and horizontally waves propagate on 160. 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ Topband mailing list Topband@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: Good tuner for 160 m, Jim Brown |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Topband: Polarisation coupling effects at MF??, Carl K9LA |
Previous by Thread: | Topband: Polarisation coupling effects at MF??, Bill Tippett |
Next by Thread: | Topband: ARRL 160M Contest - what happended to the propagation? (or about the lack of propagation at VK2), Tomas Magyla |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |