To: | "john" <jb@beaumonts.karoo.co.uk>, "topband@contesting.com" <topband@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Topband: Deep earth rod vs radials |
From: | "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com> |
Date: | Sun, 15 Mar 2009 10:08:04 -0700 |
List-post: | <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
On Sun, 15 Mar 2009 08:40:34 -0000, john wrote: >Lets say I could go down 130ft would this elimnate the need for >radials I wonder . NO! The earth is lossy, and any current in it burns transmitter power. The purpose of radials is to PREVENT transmitter current from flowing in the earth, and to cause them instead to flow in the radials, which are copper and low loss. A connection to earth, no matter how good or deep, does not improve antenna performance! Now, sea water is a different story. :) 73, Jim Brown K9YC _______________________________________________ Topband mailing list Topband@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Topband: Deep earth rod vs radials, john |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Topband: Add 160 to SB-200 ?, Mike Waters W0BTU |
Previous by Thread: | Topband: Deep earth rod vs radials, john |
Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: Deep earth rod vs radials, Guy Olinger, K2AV |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |