To: | topband reflector <topband@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Topband: Low Dipole for RX |
From: | GALE STEWARD <k3nd@yahoo.com> |
Date: | Thu, 1 Oct 2009 08:06:48 -0700 (PDT) |
List-post: | <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
Anyone using a low dipole on 160 for RX? By low, I mean 8-10ft. I could install one of these until some of the foliage dies off and I can install my two-wire beverage. Would this be useful or a waste of time? Also, if anyone is using one of these, did you attach the feedline directly or use some type of matching? Since the Z is pretty low (a few ohms), I thought a 9:1 xfmr might be appropriate. Any info appreciated! 73, Stew K3ND _______________________________________________ Topband mailing list Topband@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: Spam: VK to W0 this AM on 160m, Chortek, Robert L |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Topband: Noise Cancellation Options?, Tod - ID |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: Spam: VK to W0 this AM on 160m, Chortek, Robert L |
Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: Low Dipole for RX, Hardy Landskov |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |