| To: | topband reflector <topband@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Topband: Low Dipole for RX |
| From: | GALE STEWARD <k3nd@yahoo.com> |
| Date: | Thu, 1 Oct 2009 08:06:48 -0700 (PDT) |
| List-post: | <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
Anyone using a low dipole on 160 for RX? By low, I mean 8-10ft. I could install
one of these until some of the foliage dies off and I can install my two-wire
beverage.
Would this be useful or a waste of time? Also, if anyone is using one of these,
did you attach the feedline directly or use some type of matching? Since the Z
is pretty low (a few ohms), I thought a 9:1 xfmr might be appropriate.
Any info appreciated!
73, Stew K3ND
_______________________________________________
Topband mailing list
Topband@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: Spam: VK to W0 this AM on 160m, Chortek, Robert L |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Topband: Noise Cancellation Options?, Tod - ID |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: Spam: VK to W0 this AM on 160m, Chortek, Robert L |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: Low Dipole for RX, Hardy Landskov |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |