| To: | <topband@contesting.com> | 
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Topband: Electrical height of short shunt fed tower? | 
| From: | "Edward Swynar" <gswynar@durham.net> | 
| Date: | Tue, 10 Nov 2009 09:44:43 -0500 | 
| List-post: | <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com> | 
Years & years ago a learned & wise old Ham radio sage & friend of mine once said that ANY tower---capped with a beam up top, or not---will ALWAYS be 50% taller ELECTRICALLY than it is PHYSICALLY. I've tested this hypothesis on at least two separate occasions by way of others who were shunt-feeding their towers, & they all agreed that the "1.5 times" increase is, indeed, quite consistent & valid... ~73~ de Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ _______________________________________________ 160 meters is a serious band, it should be treated with respect. - TF4M  | 
| Previous by Date: | Topband: Modeling Shunt feed in EZ-Nec, Mike(W5UC) & Kathy(K5MWH) | 
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Topband: T88AA's QRV, tsaitou | 
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: Electrical height of short shunt fed tower?, Julius Fazekas | 
| Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: Electrical height of short shunt fed tower?, Guy Olinger K2AV | 
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |