On Mar 4, 2010, at 14:14:24, Edward Swynar wrote:
>
> Why is there apparently always such "black magic" surounding this sorta
> stuff...? No wonder there seem to be two camps anymore in the matter of
> antenna articles in the popular Ham literature, i.e. the pro-modeling crowd,
> & the "...olde-fashioned" ones...
>
> Guess which one I seem to be condemned to retaining a lifelong membership
> to---but not necessarily by choice alone, Hi Hi.
Eddy,
I've thought about 'em, built 'em and tried 'em since 1960...you can model them
all you want but the proof in in the performance when you get it in the
air...and that can't be predicted because everyone's environment is
different...:-)
If you want to model antennas, go for it, but accept that there is a pretty
steep learning curve in getting to be adept at it and producing something
that's useful. I've fumbled around in it a bit, but you still don't really know
what's going to happen until you build it.
Count me in the "old-fashioned" camp, I guess. I'll never put down those that
model antennas and produce something of value for them, but I'll be out in the
yard hanging wire...
73,
John K8AJS
bastinj@gmail.com
_______________________________________________
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
|