Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: DX Window No Long Relevant

To: <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: DX Window No Long Relevant
From: "Jorge Diez - CX6VM" <cx6vm.jorge@adinet.com.uy>
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 17:02:37 -0200
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
so you worked all you new ones during a contest in 1830-1835?

I don´t take care of this DX Windows to call, most of the time is very
crowed. I remember in last big contest that I have a nice pile up in 1822,
because I couldn´t find a free freq in 1830-1835 either with a good radio
and very far from the strong signals.

I don´t think I need to call in 1830-1835 next ARRL CW, do you suggest me to
do it? Or will be the same any frequency to call?

73,
Jorge
CX6VM/CW5W

-----Mensaje original-----
De: topband-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:topband-bounces@contesting.com]
En nombre de Hardy Landskov
Enviado el: Viernes, 04 de Febrero de 2011 12:45 p.m.
Para: John Crovelli; topband@contesting.com
Asunto: Re: Topband: DX Window No Long Relevant

John,
If it had not been for the window I could not have worked what I have on 
160. I would say it had gotten me at least a dozen new ones. One year I 
remember giving ON4UN Zone 3 in the window.
I wish you could walk in my shoes once and do a 160 contest from out here. 
It might enlighten you.
73 Hardy N7RT

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John Crovelli" <w2gd@hotmail.com>
To: <topband@contesting.com>
Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2011 8:19 AM
Subject: Topband: DX Window No Long Relevant


>
> As a courtesy, last weekend our Multi operation, as a courtesy,  refrained

> from calling CQ in what some still consider the DX Window (1830 - 1835).
>
> BUT lets be realistic here, this is 2011, not 1961.  Split operation, a 
> necessary operating technique of the W1BB era is no longer necessary. 
> Frequency allocations between ITU regions and individual countries have 
> become more aligned.  All world class radios have narrow filtering 
> capability, etc. fully capable of handling the worst pileups.
>
> The need for a "window" has diminished to the point it has become 
> irrelevant in today's world.
>
> Only the ARRL seems to hold onto the notion of a DX window in their 160 
> contest rules, but they are well known for there slowness to react to 
> current world realities.
>
> So.... I vote we assume THE 160M DX WINDOW is DEAD and move on to topics 
> which might have significantly more value to the masses.
>
> 73,
>
> John W2GD/P40W
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK 

_______________________________________________
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK

_______________________________________________
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>