Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: QRP Question

To: topband@contesting.com
Subject: Re: Topband: QRP Question
From: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 10:21:01 -0700
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
Legally signing /M is only legal if you are in England or one of the 
countries that uses the M prefix.  It is readily accepted as Mobile but 
is not a legal designator. I am not sure that most of the ones you 
listed are legal IARU or ITU call designators.  This could vary from 
country to country.

Sending  /qrp just takes up more time and adds more difficulty when 
signals are very very weak.

I also agree that those making contacts with QRP stations should be 
getting the bonuses for doing most of the work not the other way around.


Mike W0MU

W0MU-1 CC Cluster w0mu.net


On 12/12/2011 10:07 AM, Ronald Raasch wrote:
> To sign /qrp is unlegal. Bad behavior. There are only a few legal
> extensions. /p...../a..../m..../am...../1-0..Thats all i remember right
> now..
>
> 73 Ronald LA3ANA
>
>
>
>
> Am 12.12.2011, 17:58 Uhr, schrieb W0UCE<w0uce@nc.rr.com>:
>
>>
>> Maybe and experienced QRP OP can answer a question for me and please note
>> the question is not intended to anger anyone or start a flame. I would
>> just
>> like to learn something - "Why?"
>>
>> So here is the question:  Why do some using QRP continually send /QRP
>> after
>> a CQ, their call or a contest exchange?  In a contest I don't care if the
>> station I work is QRP, LP or QRO - a QSO is a QSO.
>>
>> The same when calling CQ or during a rag chewing - Why send /QRP? To me
>> it
>> makes no more sense than someone sending /100w, /LP, /1500w or /QRO after
>> their call.
>>
>> 73,
>> Jack
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
>
_______________________________________________
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>