Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: FW: Proper Decorum On The "Gentleman's Band"...

To: Ian Wade G3NRW <g3nrw-radio@ntlworld.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: FW: Proper Decorum On The "Gentleman's Band"...
From: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:24:56 -0500
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
> This isn't as far fetched as it seems. Folks on 30m, which is only
> 50kHz wide [1], manage to rub along quite nicely:

30 meters is an anomaly in that it is 50 KHz worldwide and there is
no SSB in most countries.  Even so, there is still friction among
the digital modes - particularly with the absurdly wide, automatically
controlled PACTOR II & III garbage generators that seem to come up
at will on top of existing activity.

73,

    ... Joe, W4TV


On 2/9/2012 2:16 PM, Ian Wade G3NRW wrote:
> ___Original Message_________________________________________
> From: n0ah. ham Paul Veal<bryonveal@msn.com>
> Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012   Time: 10:10:55
>
>> It would be great if a firm volunteer band plan would be created and
>> supported to spare us all the grief of overlapping modes- One that would be
>> up to date on today's technology and various international band allocations-
>> It just seems from 1.800-1.850, the overlap continues between contesting,
>> DX'ing, and modes of operation......while all the SSB ops up above 1.900MHz
>> seem to have it figured out-
>   >
>   >
>   >
>
> This isn't as far fetched as it seems. Folks on 30m, which is only 50kHz
> wide [1], manage to rub along quite nicely:
>
>     http://homepage.ntlworld.com/wadei/30m_band_utilization.htm
>
> Maybe something like this could serve as a model for top band.
>
_______________________________________________
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>