Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: Fw: Re: : antenna question ...this is not goingtodieqiuite

To: <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: Fw: Re: : antenna question ...this is not goingtodieqiuite yet....................
From: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Reply-to: Tom W8JI <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 10:05:43 -0500
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
And one should never rely on a single source of information unless it has been well vetted. That is something that wont happen on Antennex but there are enough qualified people on Eham and here to seperate truth and fiction.

Unfortunately that isn't true.

The number of people viewing something one way with unscientific methods (my xxx worked great and made more contacts than any other xxx I had) another never determines what answer is accurate.

Often the most repeated and simple answers, or emotional answers, are more often accepted.

How something works is never settled by popular vote or argument, or by blind faith. It is settled by known physics and measurement.

In this case anyone building an antenna from twin lead and writing an article could (or should) have taken the time to actually measure a folded dipole. had they done that, they would find resonant frequency does not change a measurable amount when the dipole goes from regular dipole mode to folded dipole mode. This clearly means the velocity factor is not a measurable factor in the system and shorts are not needed, because there is no resonance shift when operating folded or parallel modes.

The real problem is we have data based on assumptions or feelings without verification.

73 Tom
_______________________________________________
Topband reflector - topband@contesting.com

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>