To: | "'Mike\(W5UC\) & Kathy \(K5MWH\)'" <w5uc@suddenlink.net>, <topband@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Topband: Heater Choke Value |
From: | "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com> |
Date: | Thu, 10 Jan 2013 16:52:23 -0500 |
List-post: | <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
Typical reactance rule of thumb is 5 to 10X the input impedance of the
tube(s).
In some cases it is much less and the 160M input network is modified to compensate. #18 or 20 enamel wire would be suitable for 4A and be a lot easier to wind than 12 and require a lot less ferrite. Carl KM1H Mike(W5UC) & Kathy (K5MWH) Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2013 4:37 PM To: topband@contesting.com Subject: Topband: Heater Choke Value Hello Fellow Topbanders:I have just started the process of converting a MLA-2500 amplifier from it'soriginal 8875 tubes to Gi-7b tubes. Current;y I can run only abut 400 watts on Topband, (not from the MLA=2500, I have no tubes for it) The conversion requires a RF Choke in the filament lines. I have searched the Handbook, and looked at several schematics with no luck. Please, can someone out there advise the value of reactance required for this effort. Most construction articles recommend #12 wire, which in this case, appears to be significant over kill, as the heater current is only 4 amps total. Thanks & 73, Mike, W5UC _________________ Topband Reflector |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Topband: flag for 160m rx in differend size, dl8yhrfrank |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Topband: A 160 Meter antenne puzzle, Carl |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: Heater Choke Value, Charlie Cunningham |
Next by Thread: | Topband: Finally conditions shift to KH6, Merv Schweigert |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |