At best mag loop lowers the noise in two directions drastically - along
with any signals in those two spots. But in the non null areas there are
absolutely no characteristics of the loop which are beneficial for DX
other than getting whatever you may get. Also know the loop has no
vertical or horizontal directivity except for the two sharp nulls off the
end of the loop so all atmospheric noise will be collected by th antenna
and your DX will compete I that noise floor for notice. For most local
non DX work in very noisy spots these are great.
If you want DX Id try a MFJ nuller and a k9ay or flag.
73 W2PM
That is an accurate analysis of a loop. The "magnetic myth", or shielding,
is mostly Hamlore.
A properly constructed loop is the same with or without a shield, and has a
pattern that produces sharp point nulls through the axis.
An improperly constructed loop, with or without the "shield", has a messy
pattern and may not have complete nulls in any direction.
The field response, or field impedance, is only magnetic dominant within a
small fraction of a wavelength. Very near field noise might be electric or
magnetic field dominant, it is random. Far field noise and far field loop
response is electromagnetic without field gender discrimination. In the far
field (over 1/2 - 1 wavelength), all signals and all smaller antennas look
exactly the same for field ratios. This includes noise from distant
lightning, or signals from transmitters
This is why sometimes loops help, sometimes poorly designed are better than
well designed loops, and quite often they do nothing at all. Sometimes they
make things worse. Most are sold by mythology, like homeopathic medicines.
73 Tom
All good topband ops know how to put up a beverage at night.
_________________
Topband Reflector
|