To: | topband <topband@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Topband: 5/8 wavelength vertical is mo betta than shorterversions?? |
From: | Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com> |
Date: | Thu, 26 Sep 2013 09:52:34 -0500 |
List-post: | <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
A lot of hams on 160m have been similarly "shocked". :-) 73, Mike www.w0btu.com On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Niko Cimbur <ac6dd@yahoo.com> wrote: > > We were shocked to find that the existing 1/4 wl performed better than the > much taller [5/8 wave] Vertical. > _________________ Topband Reflector |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: 5/8 wavelength vertical is mo betta than shorterversions??, Clive GM3POI |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Topband: 5/8 wavelength vertical is mo betta than shorterversions??, Charlie Cunningham |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: 5/8 wavelength vertical is mo betta than shorterversions??, Clive GM3POI |
Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: 5/8 wavelength vertical is mo betta than shorterversions??, Charlie Cunningham |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |