Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: ARRL CW SS started. Why is nobody on 160?

To: topband@contesting.com
Subject: Re: Topband: ARRL CW SS started. Why is nobody on 160?
From: Herbert Schoenbohm <herbs@vitelcom.net>
Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2014 11:39:18 -0400
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
About 25 years ago I was the only station in the VI on CW SS and in protest to the ARRL's contest policies I was exclusively on 160....problem was that there was no spotting back then and I only worked a dozen stations. I would do this again but now VI is no longer rare as it was then.


Herb, KV4FZ
On 11/3/2014 10:50 AM, john wrote:
Since there is no Mult advantage on 160m and you can not dupe stations worked 
on other bands, there is little reason for 160. Almost everyone you would work 
on 160 will be big on 80.
John K9DX
Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2014 21:34:51 -0500
From: mikewate@gmail.com
To: topband@contesting.com
Subject: Topband: ARRL CW SS started. Why is nobody on 160?

I just tuned across the low end of 160, and nothing (except one RTTY
signal)! Is my receiver broke? I expected to hear at least SOME CW.

I did just get struck by lightning a few days ago; maybe I have a problem I
didn't know about. But I hear RCR on AM loud on 1860. And yes, I do believe
the UTC date and time is correct here.

I assume that this contest is just not popular on 160.

http://www.hornucopia.com/contestcal/weeklycont.php#5620
http://www.arrl.org/sweepstakes

73, Mike
www.w0btu.com
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
                                        
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>