| To: | topband@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Topband: Looking for 160m narrow beam RX advice - an interesting combination of ideas |
| From: | Herbert Schoenbohm <herbs@vitelcom.net> |
| Date: | Wed, 07 Jan 2015 06:03:16 -0400 |
| List-post: | <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
On 1/6/2015 7:57 PM, Tom W8JI wrote: "but it would be much more simple to build a directive antenna with deep nulls to the sides"This is what I would like to try....but what are the best antennas for maximum side lobe rejection. I have looked at the charts so far and see F/B and gain expressed but I am not able to find "side lobe" rejection comparisons listed. Can you help? Herb Schoenbohm, KV4FZ _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: Looking for 160m narrow beam RX advice - an interesting combination of ideas, Herbert Schoenbohm |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Topband: Looking for 160m narrow beam RX advice - an interesting combination of ideas, Lloyd Berg - N9LB |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: Looking for 160m narrow beam RX advice - an interesting combination of ideas, Herbert Schoenbohm |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: Looking for 160m narrow beam RX advice - an interesting combination of ideas, Lloyd Berg - N9LB |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |