| To: | <mstangelo@comcast.net>, "Chuck Hutton" <charlesh3@msn.com>, "Richard Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>, "Top Band Reflector" <topband@contesting.com> | 
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Topband: RG-6 questions | 
| From: | "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com> | 
| Reply-to: | Tom W8JI <w8ji@w8ji.com> | 
| Date: | Mon, 16 Mar 2015 11:27:35 -0400 | 
| List-post: | <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com> | 
I better correct two pre-coffee typos I made: That is NOT the voltage breakdown of the coax from center to shield. That is a wiring class voltage, similar to the jacket punch-through to a bare external conductor.If you take regular foam dielectric "RG6" (which is almost never a real RG6 style) cable and strip back the end, and high pot the cable, the center to shield dielectric breakdown of cable ***withOUT** a flaw is over 12 kV. This means modern RG6-type (which was also called "F6" and isn't a real RG6 military number with copper shield and solid dielectric), if it does not have a serious internal flaw, at even a remotely reasonable SWR, is heat limited. _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband  | 
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> | 
|---|---|---|
 
  | ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: Use of Remote Receivers During 160 Meter Contests, Tree | 
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Topband: Use of Remote Receivers During 160 Meter Contests, W0MU Mike Fatchett | 
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: RG-6 questions, Tom W8JI | 
| Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: RG-6 questions, mstangelo | 
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |