| To: | John Crovelli <w2gd@hotmail.com>, Topband <topband@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Topband: Additional Comments on Impact of Remote RX Systems |
| From: | Victor Goncharsky <us5we@bk.ru> |
| Reply-to: | Victor Goncharsky <us5we@bk.ru> |
| Date: | Tue, 24 Mar 2015 09:21:34 +0300 |
| List-post: | <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
Hi John, I vote for solution B >B. Remote RX systems must be no more than 100 km from the TX antenna >location. > >Thanks again for your interest in this subject and your thoughtful comments. >Regards, >John, W2GD > > >_________________ >Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband -- 73, Victor Goncharsky US5WE/K1WE (UW5W in VHF contests, ex UB5WE), P.E. UARL Technical and VHF Committies DXCC Honor Roll #1 (Mixed, Phone) DXCC card checker (160 meters). _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: Additional Comments on Impact of Remote RX Systems, Bob Garrett |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Topband: Topband Digest, Vol 147, Issue 25, Rune Øye |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: Additional Comments on Impact of Remote RX Systems, Bob Garrett |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: Additional Comments on Impact of Remote RX Systems, john@kk9a.com |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |