Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: QRP

To: "Michel Spelier" <on7eh@skynet.be>, "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>, "Art Snapper" <art@nk8x.net>
Subject: Re: Topband: QRP
From: "Mort" <mort.g2jl@ntlworld.com>
Reply-to: Mort <mort.g2jl@ntlworld.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 13:28:31 -0000
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
Well,  IMO the problem with QRP QSO is definitely the increase in man-made 
noise.  We had a 10 Watt DC input to "the valve or valve energising the aerial" 
or as we must now say,  since American has displaced English, to "the tube or 
tubes energising the antenna".

Even so,  enthusiasts in good locations with space for an effective TX antenna 
achieved DXCC even observing that restriction. Beverages (except for 
tranquillising the operator) were seldom needed or used.  Nowadays,  anyone 
using QRP in a spacious location is either a Masochist,  or doomed to 
disappointment.

It is yet another aspect of inflation.  In my time,  a pint (568 ml) of beer in 
a pub has risen by a factor of 26...



73  -  Mort,  G2JL
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>